government should spend more money putting in more works of art雅思写作艺术类8分范文

雅思写作艺术类题目

Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

一些人认为政府应该加大投入在城市中添加诸如画作和雕塑之类的艺术品，以让它变得更加适合居住。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意这一看法?

雅思写作艺术类范文

开头段

Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life.Personally,I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.

一些人认为政府应该在城市中投资修建更多的公共艺术品以提升生活质量。我个人不同意这一观点，因为它对普通民众影响有限。

艺术品的作用

On the one hand,public art beautifies a city.A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work.In contrast,cities that have invested heavily in public art,such as New York City,offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home.A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day.This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instils a sense of pride,but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city,both of which contribute to a vibrant city.

一方面，公共艺术能够美化城市。被剥去所有艺术的城市会因纯粹的功利价值和日常的艰苦工作而呈现出沉闷的景色。相比之下，在公共艺术上投入大笔资金的城市，如纽约，为其居民提供美丽的环境。回家路上看到雕塑和壁画的儿童会觉得城市是个居住的好地方，而经过艺术品的员工会从一天繁忙的生活中得以喘息。这不仅会构建当地居民的性格，让他们感到骄傲，而且还吸引游客和专业艺术家。这两者都会塑造一个生机勃勃的城市。

其他领域更加重要

Nonetheless,public art has little quantifiable positive value.Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art.This art,therefore,means nothing to most locals,while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget.There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure,well-rounded healthcare systems,and modern recreational facilities.Moreover,the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms,bus stops or parks.Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.

然而，公共艺术的积极价值有限。大多数城市居民忙于工作，注意不到公共艺术。因此，这些艺术对于大多数当地居民来说毫无意义，却会占用一座城市的预算。其他更为重要的领域需要投资，如良好的基础设施，健全的卫生系统，现代休闲设施等。此外，用于陈列这些艺术品的公共空间无法用于实际目的，如休息室、公交车站或公园这样的重要公共设施。那些依赖以上设施的人会更难找到它们，而他们的生活质量也会受到偏爱艺术的影响。

结论

Despite the aesthetic value of public art,government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents.There must be a degree of balance but it should always tip more towards pragmatism.

尽管公共艺术的审美价值，政府机构应该更多关注真正影响其选区居民的问题。两者之间应该存在一定的平衡，但它应该更加倾向于实用主义。

>> 雅思 托福 免费测试、量身规划、让英语学习不再困难<<