With James Cameron having converted "Titanic" to 3-D in celebration of the film's 15th anniversary, watching the new version also points up just how unnecessary such technological gimmicks are when you have a perfectly good original in the first place.
　　为了庆祝电影《泰坦尼克号》15周年的庆典，詹姆斯·卡梅隆已经将电影《泰坦尼克号》改编成为3D版。观看这个新版本的同时，我们发现，当你能够在一开始有一个完美的原始版本，科技噱头显得多么的没有必要。

　　Different people have their options for this controversial movie. Someone loves this movie, however, loathes it. As "Titanic" goes back into our lives in 3D, The Washington Post raised a great debate. It posted a vote “ Is Titanic Art or junk?” on its website. Till today, about 37% readers regard it as art, but 67% voters think it is an iceberg in the ocean of American culture. Let us see some comments.
　　对这部备受争议的电影，不同的人有不同的观点。有些人爱这部电影，然而，也有人讨厌它。当《泰坦尼克号》把我们的生活带到3D的世界，《华盛顿邮报》提出了一个巨大的辩题。《华盛顿邮报》在自己的网站上发起了一个投票，“到底泰坦尼克号是艺术品，还是垃圾？”截止今天，大约有37%的读者认为他是个艺术品，但是有67%的投票者认为他是美国文化海洋中的一座冰山。让我们来看看一些评论吧！

　Support Art:
　　支持是艺术：

　　amithereyet wrote: …the richness and realism of the backdrop is a really remarkable achievement, and the film is full of the kind of telling character details that so often go missing…
　　amithereyet写道：……电影背景的丰富性和真实性的确是一个卓越的成就，同时，这部电影对角色细节的刻画是现在越来越被忽视的……

　　rowunderdca wrote:…Cameron tried some of the same tricks with Avatar: the unknown culture and masks as metaphors for the pursuit of intimacy. I think it worked in Titanic but not in Avatar….
　　rowunderca写道：……卡梅隆在《阿凡达》里也做了一些相同的尝试：用不同的文化和面具作为隐喻来比喻对亲密行为的追求。我认为在《泰坦尼克号》里，而不是《阿凡达》里，这个技术有成功的效果。

　　grobinette wrote: I enjoyed it, that is all that matters to me.
　　grpbinette写道：我很喜欢它，这对我来说就是最重要的。

　　flippycanoo wrote:…I didn't think this film was "junk" but it was "art" in the sense that it recreated an event on an epic and romantic scale.
　　flippycanoo写道：我不认为这个片子是“垃圾”，从某种意义上说，它是个“艺术”，它以史诗般和浪漫的视角重新创造了一个故事。

　　bypr54 wrote:…It is definitely not junk. It is worth watching for nothing else but the scene where the actual wreckage is brought to vivid life.
　　bypr54写道：……它当然不是一个垃圾。它值得去欣赏，为了去欣赏那些真正的船骸被带进生动的生活中的场面。